課程名稱: 公眾演講 (PUBLIC SPEAKING/COMMUNICATION)
授課教師姓名及職稱: Dana Badger Simpson, Professor
適合修習對象: Undergraduate students need to get credits for language courses.
師生互動討論方式: Email, WeChat Group
1. Explain the mechanics and content of an effective public speech.
2. Create rubrics and give feedback as a critical listener
3. Recognize personal speech habits to further their competencies and show improved self-confidence in prepared and extemporaneous speeches
4. Present different kinds of speeches and use visual aids effectively when giving presentations.
週次1: (遠距教學)Introduction to course; Speaking in Public; Ethics and Public Speaking, Listening; Giving Your First Speech.
週次2: (遠距教學)Speaking to inform; Speech of Introduction; Selecting a Topic and a Purpose; Analyzing the Audience.
週次3: (遠距教學)Speaking to Persuade; Methods of Persuasion; Gathering Materials Supporting Your Ideas; Organizing the Body of the Speech; Beginning and Ending the Speech.
週次4: (遠距教學)Speaking on Special Occasions; Outlining the Speech; Using Visual Aids; Speaking in Small Groups.
週次5: (遠距教學)Speaking on Special Occasions; Outlining the Speech; Using Visual Aids; Speaking in Small Groups.
- ☑ 提供線上課程主要及補充教材
- ☑ 提供線上非同步教學
- ☑ 有線上教師或線上助教
- ☑ 提供線上同步教學，次數：5次，總時數：5小時
- ☑ 個人資料
- ☑ 課程資訊
- ☑ 其他相關資料管理功能
- ☑ 最新消息發佈、瀏覽
- ☑ 教材內容設計、觀看、下載
- ☑ 成績系統管理及查詢
- ☑ 進行線上測驗、發佈
- ☑ 互動式學習設計(聊天室或討論區)
- Speech of Introduction (3 minutes) --> 10% of grade
- Persuasive Speech (5 minutes) --> 10% of grade
- Special Occasion Speech (5 minutes) --> 15% of grade
- Group Speech (10 minutes) --> 15% of grade
- Outlines --> 10% of grade
- Quizzes --> 25% of grade
- Final Reflective Portfolio (5 minutes) --> 15% of grade
- Total = 100%
- Feng Chia University defines academic misconduct as any act by a student that misrepresents the student’s own academic work or that compromises the academic work of another. Scholastic misconduct includes (but is not limited to) cheating on assignments or examinations; plagiarizing, i.e., misrepresenting as one’s own work any work done by another; submitting the same paper, or a substantially similar paper, to meet the requirements of more than one course without the approval and consent of the instructors concerned; or sabotaging another’s work within these general definitions. Instructors, however, determine what constitutes academic misconduct in the courses they teach. Students found guilty of academic misconduct in any portion of the academic work face penalties that range from the lowering of their course grade to awarding a grade of F for the entire course.